Should sugary drinks be taxed like tobacco?
Public health intervention versus personal freedom.
Sign in to participate
Join this debate to vote on arguments, post your own arguments, and switch sides if you're convinced.
For(5)
Arguments supporting this position
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
Medical research demonstrates significant positive correlation. Studies published in The Lancet show superior literacy rates.
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
We don't tax those people enough. Everything needs to be taxed to ensure we have a stable society
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
Medical research demonstrates significant positive correlation. Studies published in The Lancet show superior literacy rates.
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
Sugar is essential for energy. It would be unfair to target athletes only in this way.
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
Preventive measures are more effective than treatment: longitudinal studies. Long-term health markers show significant improvement.
Against(4)
Arguments opposing this position
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
The science is inconclusive: contradictory meta-analyses. More research needed on quality and safety.
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
The science is inconclusive: contradictory meta-analyses. More research needed on quality and safety.
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
Implementation creates capital flight. Lower-income populations are disproportionately affected.
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
The science is inconclusive: contradictory meta-analyses. More research needed on quality and safety.