Balancing innovation with safety in artificial intelligence.
Join this debate to vote on arguments, post your own arguments, and switch sides if you're convinced.
Arguments supporting this position
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
Innovation requires freedom from excessive restrictions. History shows that precedent from the 1950s led to unprecedented progress.
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
Innovation requires freedom from excessive restrictions. History shows that precedent from the 1950s led to unprecedented progress.
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
Innovation requires freedom from excessive restrictions. History shows that precedent from the 1950s led to unprecedented progress.
Arguments opposing this position
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
The benefits outweigh the risks: efficiency gains of 60%. Proper safeguards include industry self-regulation.
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
Market forces naturally regulate quality and safety. Consumer choice drives continuous improvement.
Each participant has 6 votes:
Positive: +20, +10, +2 points
Negative: -10, -5, -1 points
Score = Positive - Negative
Votes can be moved after 7 days
Market forces naturally regulate quality and safety. Consumer choice drives continuous improvement.