Should college athletes be paid?

Debating compensation and amateurism in collegiate sports.

β€’Dec 23, 2024β€’9 argumentsβ€’106 votes
40% For60% Against
18 For27 Against

Sign in to participate

Join this debate to vote on arguments, post your own arguments, and switch sides if you're convinced.

For(5)

Arguments supporting this position

T
Tina595
+77
102 up / 25 down

Consider the era and competition level: rule changes and competition depth. Modern/historical advantages include advanced training and nutrition.

X
Xander702
+47
74 up / 27 down

Championships and accolades speak for themselves: 4 championships and 8 finals appearances. The impact on the game is undeniable.

F
Frank124
+34
66 up / 32 down

Consider the era and competition level: rule changes and competition depth. Modern/historical advantages include advanced training and nutrition.

B
Ben166
+22
44 up / 22 down

Consider the era and competition level: rule changes and competition depth. Modern/historical advantages include advanced training and nutrition.

FU
Former User
+16
42 up / 26 down

Consider the era and competition level: rule changes and competition depth. Modern/historical advantages include advanced training and nutrition.

Against(4)

Arguments opposing this position

P
Pam121
🎯Changed 2 minds
+121
148 up / 27 down

Context matters immensely: hand-checking rules and three-point line. Comparing across eras ignores athleticism and training methods.

R
Ron265
+53
78 up / 25 down

Statistics don't tell the whole story: leadership and clutch performance. Impact extends beyond numbers to cultural impact.

C
Chloe829
🎯Changed 2 minds
+52
66 up / 14 down

Competition level varies significantly: expansion era versus modern depth. Modern/historical advantages include weaker competition / sports science advances.

M
Mia554
+4
42 up / 38 down

Statistics don't tell the whole story: leadership and clutch performance. Impact extends beyond numbers to cultural impact.